smack it not pat it

I had the most ridiculous difficulty doing this pecha kucha because I couldn’t decide what topic to do it on – think I redid it 3 times in total? (cats, cakes and then 90s VK bands lol) in the end I decided something both simpler and harder. In any case, it has both cats *and* nazis, which means I win the internet right?



night of fire!

cg models done this week:



Some people make houses, I make nightclubs full of jazz music and purple-blue lighting that looks like an aquarium. If you can guess the nightclub I’m talking about, you win a cookie! 😀

chronic timezones-sitis

Got it done by 5.30am, jackpot!

-email sent
-first round of deliverables

plus I phrased it really gently, haven’t used formalspeak for a long time. For my own reference, timeline:

…….. I also really should get some sleep. I wonder if there’s a name, for people who can never live in the correct timezone. Regardless of where I am, regardless of how jetlagged it is I just never seem to live within normal waking-sleeping hours lol

blue light of the jaded sun

真夏の太陽, 想いを重ねた季節….風に流された, 君には2度と届かず

(I have no courage. 絶望!!!!! D: D: D: someone give me courage!!!)

Today went to work on the IS, behold our cake mix:


Smooth cast epoxy from

4 ratios

4 containers with differing amount of wood mix, and the control element with no additives cos we realised that all of them were rising after 15mins and wondered if it was a natural thing or because of the additives. Conclusion: the control epoxy had many tiny bubbles in it, but it didn’t boil over so I’m guessing it’s the additives and since it’s very powdery it increased surface area (many bubbles + many tiny particles) which resulted in this weird cake mix growth. Closeups:





Conclusion? This epoxy with additive gives you booger-looking plastic. 2nd conclusion? Go try another plastic, but the spongebob-look is kinda cool for reference.

‘perhaps, he longer realises he is the master of his own domain’

……. is it terrible, that *that* is the first line that I think of during the domain-mapping workshop in class? It refers to one of my old psych texts – back when I was still toying with being a psych major (rationale: better pay, cool job-potential and the guys in psych were hotter.) about Piaget’s development growth for children. Aged 3-6, they begin to experience/think outside themselves, and for the first time, realise a world that is out of their control. In effect, they realise that there are domains which they have no mastery over which results in learning (and tears of frustration!) It’s not exactly related, but it’s quite interesting to think about.

Anyway here’s my domain-mapping map:



We were supposed to do a venn-diagram, but eh, I’ve done enough of those back in asian-school when everything was a freakin pie chart and venn diagram and I really *really* didn’t want to do another. My original idea was to use the map of Manhattan and the boroughs to draw a kind of map-on-map thing (especially with the grid system, would be nice) and the height of the buildings to reflect the importance as well as creating a thought-class-categorising system.


Once I started to draw, I realised that I couldn’t work that way, it just didn’t seem ‘right’. So. Anyway. That’s how the face came out. I wasn’t really consciously thinking of drawing a profile in particular, but that’s how it came out. Now I think about it, I quite like the idea of using the face – first it’s because the face presents both interior/exterior (thought/emotion), second is because the face has the most muscles in per capita, and it’s also the most sensoral part of the body. The idea that each area is a muscle, and muscles have to work together to function; metaphorically, works nicely I think. There’s also a bit of colour-coding going on, but not really notable.

Today’s reading was on the Jamer Hunt’s Manifesto and I was kinda; ehhhhh…… over some of the things he said. I think part of my reluctance is also because I’m wary of anyone who throws a lot of newfangled terminology (post industrial?metabolic?sounds like marketing gimmicks)

My biggest complaint is this:
The movement towards mass production of production, cloud computing (esp. in regards to distributed network intelligences) is a return to the original idea of a terminal, where each terminal is a gateway point to a larger producer (or rather, each individual entity producer pushes forth a method of production to a greater mass of production i.e. 1up the chain) and this kind of behaviour, of terminals and very specialised units of production – where each community can crowdsource specialised skills to a greater cause or assemblage is well………’s basically Fordism!

Maybe not Fordist in the way that most people understand it – as factory assemblage, but a communal, crowdsourced assemblage that is *still* dictated by a greater entity. Only that this entity is no longer the terrifying Factory, but has been remodeled insidiously as platforms, channels or ‘Clouds’ where everyone happily signs away minutes of their play time for labour.

In turn, this is reflected in the current state of living. (the proof is in the bread-pudding?) It’s true that technology takes away jobs and turns them obsolete, but what we are experiencing is beyond that. If it was simply job obsolescence – well, that happened in the 18th century too, when printing presses took away people’s jobs permanently. I would say that technology exacerbates the current situation, but is not the wholly to blame for all the crap that’s happening.

What I think is that this kind of new Fordism – where play has been labour’fied, and platform control is that you have a kind of plutocracy in the strictest sense. Hunt touches on this as well, he talks about people no longer ‘owning’ items but ‘leasing’ them constantly…… which points back to the idea of a rentier class. The idea of a rentier class comes from David Ricardo . He defines a rentier class owns some kind of property that everyone else needs in order to invent or create or build anything else. The original rentier class of Ricardo’s day owned land. Land was the vice that gripped the rise of industry,  today it’s capital. The part of the surplus diverted to an unproductive ruling class isn’t rent any more, it’s interest.

With the OccupyWallStreet movement, it’s easy to see that the modern ruling class are all rentier classes. They don’t produce anything, and the problem isn’t even in production (physical, tangible) anyway – even if you gave everyone a 3-D printer and the ability to mass produce mass production, it’s not going to change because the issue is here is about value. It’s the fact that you don’t have to make, or even do anything that will produce – it’s about beating the system, and your value comes from how well you play the system (think it was John? who mentioned financialisation gaming) so what was previously relational (i.e. the price of food is related to the amount of food produced and demand for food) has now been destroyed by speculation and financial gaming.

So yeah, the future of design is here – it’s all code and games and producing valueless cool shit (re: junk), but do you really want to stay around just to hack the system out? or is there a better way of living?

digital springclean

12midnight cleanup – took me a while to fix everything up nicely; change the sitenames and stuff (wonder how many people will come here looking for cake recipes lol) and redid the header – which, after 5 tries, STILL looks wonky. It’s not my side, but wordpress because their banner size request is not the same as the actual upload size. Ridiculous. Anyway, features a rather delicious but zen colours of muted green and pink with cupcakes and cultery (good stuff!)

Also added new categories for the new semester, I’m not sure if I want to put all my classes in (the architecture and CG character ones) since those seem more skill based and it’ll be boring….. idk. We’ll see. It’s nice to see the menu all laid out at the top, very appealing and easy to search since I hate scrolling unnecessarily.